<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Next on Nine: Ugly Betty&#8230;&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html</link>
	<description>Australia&#039;s leading TV blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:53:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zambora</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-42022</link>
		<dc:creator>Zambora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-42022</guid>
		<description>Mini update - have to laugh at Freeview ads.
Bringing you the best in Television by the people that are the best in television.
Sorry networks, I don&#039;t trust you and P.S. you are not the best in television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mini update &#8211; have to laugh at Freeview ads.<br />
Bringing you the best in Television by the people that are the best in television.<br />
Sorry networks, I don&#8217;t trust you and P.S. you are not the best in television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zambora</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41442</link>
		<dc:creator>Zambora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41442</guid>
		<description>David&#039;s question - two biggest broadcasters can’t build a decent third channel each with the content they already control, do they really deserve one?
Zam&#039;s answer - No.
Here is solution to Nine and Seven&#039;s programming nightmare (err lack of trust in own programming gurus) - ask the viewers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David&#8217;s question &#8211; two biggest broadcasters can’t build a decent third channel each with the content they already control, do they really deserve one?<br />
Zam&#8217;s answer &#8211; No.<br />
Here is solution to Nine and Seven&#8217;s programming nightmare (err lack of trust in own programming gurus) &#8211; ask the viewers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41417</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41417</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t undrestand their argument either. Technology has moved on and all new TV&#039;s with digital tuners or set top boxes have parential locks. Shouldn&#039;t TV executives be aligned with the current technology not behind it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t undrestand their argument either. Technology has moved on and all new TV&#8217;s with digital tuners or set top boxes have parential locks. Shouldn&#8217;t TV executives be aligned with the current technology not behind it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone BBBA</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41332</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone BBBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41332</guid>
		<description>Good to see the networks sticking up for themselves and their viewers for once in terms of challenging the classification guidelines 

It wouldn&#039;t be possible for them to justify the financial cost of reviewing and editing PG rated programs to comply with the G rated timeslot when they&#039;re only going to be watched by a few tens of thousands of people, so if you want decent programming on these channels, I suggest you support this move.

Now what they need to do is push for the 6:00 to 7:00 timeslot to be made PG. Unfortunately though, Ten are the only Channel who have to put up with this and edit shows such as The Simpsons and Friends, seeing as Seven and Nine both have news and current affairs on during that timeslot, which are not classified as G or PG etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see the networks sticking up for themselves and their viewers for once in terms of challenging the classification guidelines </p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be possible for them to justify the financial cost of reviewing and editing PG rated programs to comply with the G rated timeslot when they&#8217;re only going to be watched by a few tens of thousands of people, so if you want decent programming on these channels, I suggest you support this move.</p>
<p>Now what they need to do is push for the 6:00 to 7:00 timeslot to be made PG. Unfortunately though, Ten are the only Channel who have to put up with this and edit shows such as The Simpsons and Friends, seeing as Seven and Nine both have news and current affairs on during that timeslot, which are not classified as G or PG etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grinspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41313</link>
		<dc:creator>Grinspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 01:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41313</guid>
		<description>With &quot;PG rating across the multi-channels’ programming schedules&quot;

I assume that just means day time, not 24hours a day? At night they would show M and so forth yeah? 

With the G rating 4-7? How does a show like Bold and Beautiful fit in to that? It&#039;s got adult themes in it all the time. I&#039;d image it to be a PG show.


A lifestyle channel, and an entertainment channel. I wonder if they&#039;ll just use the extra SD channel or use the HD. Better not use the HD. I honestly don&#039;t know why they can&#039;t just provide a new channel which is a mixture of programming. As with Tens sport only channel, a life style channel would result in a section of people who will just never watch the channel.
Entertainment can mean anything, but sounds on the right track. I just see that there&#039;s so many shows handled poorly on the networks, so many shows that are just never aired, why not use the channels for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With &#8220;PG rating across the multi-channels’ programming schedules&#8221;</p>
<p>I assume that just means day time, not 24hours a day? At night they would show M and so forth yeah? </p>
<p>With the G rating 4-7? How does a show like Bold and Beautiful fit in to that? It&#8217;s got adult themes in it all the time. I&#8217;d image it to be a PG show.</p>
<p>A lifestyle channel, and an entertainment channel. I wonder if they&#8217;ll just use the extra SD channel or use the HD. Better not use the HD. I honestly don&#8217;t know why they can&#8217;t just provide a new channel which is a mixture of programming. As with Tens sport only channel, a life style channel would result in a section of people who will just never watch the channel.<br />
Entertainment can mean anything, but sounds on the right track. I just see that there&#8217;s so many shows handled poorly on the networks, so many shows that are just never aired, why not use the channels for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41297</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41297</guid>
		<description>Does that mean Emdur can go on Rove all he likes now?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that mean Emdur can go on Rove all he likes now?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earthquake</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41283</link>
		<dc:creator>Earthquake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41283</guid>
		<description>I like the sound of these channels. Makes you wonder whether Ten/One could buy the rights to some of the lesser sports on Nine, Seven and ABC and put them on One as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the sound of these channels. Makes you wonder whether Ten/One could buy the rights to some of the lesser sports on Nine, Seven and ABC and put them on One as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41281</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41281</guid>
		<description>They should allow M rated content all day because all digital set top boxes have the technology to block out programs based on their classification.

Another part of the problem is network being more free wheeling with the M classification and more strict on the PG rating.  So many things get rated M now that would have been PG when I was a kid - it&#039;s unbeleivable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should allow M rated content all day because all digital set top boxes have the technology to block out programs based on their classification.</p>
<p>Another part of the problem is network being more free wheeling with the M classification and more strict on the PG rating.  So many things get rated M now that would have been PG when I was a kid &#8211; it&#8217;s unbeleivable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirben</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41280</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41280</guid>
		<description>The extras costs of offering more content? why not show the content that has been previously buried by these channels, especially in the case of Nine.

I&#039;m tired of Nine letting the rights of Warner Brothers cartoon series expire (ie Justice League Unlimited season 1/2, Xiaolin Showdown season 1/2), before actually showing them.

Season 7 of Malcolm in the Middle still has not been shown by Nine, although they finally showed the rest of season 6 (with frequent timeslot changes).

When did the 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM timeslot on (free to air) TV  become limited to only G rated TV shows? many of the best kids TV series are PG rated, so that leaves no suitable timeslot available. That explains why kids programming in that particular timeslot, has gotten much worse over the years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The extras costs of offering more content? why not show the content that has been previously buried by these channels, especially in the case of Nine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tired of Nine letting the rights of Warner Brothers cartoon series expire (ie Justice League Unlimited season 1/2, Xiaolin Showdown season 1/2), before actually showing them.</p>
<p>Season 7 of Malcolm in the Middle still has not been shown by Nine, although they finally showed the rest of season 6 (with frequent timeslot changes).</p>
<p>When did the 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM timeslot on (free to air) TV  become limited to only G rated TV shows? many of the best kids TV series are PG rated, so that leaves no suitable timeslot available. That explains why kids programming in that particular timeslot, has gotten much worse over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benno</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41275</link>
		<dc:creator>Benno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41275</guid>
		<description>I find it amusing that the government has a switch off date of 2013, and media experts are predicting the current television distribution model in Australia will cease to exist by that date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amusing that the government has a switch off date of 2013, and media experts are predicting the current television distribution model in Australia will cease to exist by that date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41245</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41245</guid>
		<description>With the amount of shows out there surely there is enough content to file the 2nd channel.

This whole Freeview thing speaks of desperation too me, more and more people getting Foxtel and loving it, finding shows the FTA networks never finished showing or stuck in the middle of the night on HD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the amount of shows out there surely there is enough content to file the 2nd channel.</p>
<p>This whole Freeview thing speaks of desperation too me, more and more people getting Foxtel and loving it, finding shows the FTA networks never finished showing or stuck in the middle of the night on HD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2008/12/next-on-nine-ugly-betty.html/comment-page-1#comment-41240</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=18409#comment-41240</guid>
		<description>&quot;The free-to-air networks are reportedly arguing these rules should not be extended to the multi-channels, as only a limited amount of households have digital set-top boxes that enable them to be viewed.&quot;

what sort of logical argument is that??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The free-to-air networks are reportedly arguing these rules should not be extended to the multi-channels, as only a limited amount of households have digital set-top boxes that enable them to be viewed.&#8221;</p>
<p>what sort of logical argument is that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 444/445 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.tvtonight.com.au @ 2012-02-13 02:11:02 -->
