<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: homeMADE in trouble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html</link>
	<description>Australia&#039;s leading TV blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-69096</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 01:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-69096</guid>
		<description>I am an Interior Designer and I, along with other colleagues, was asked to audtion for a judging role on the show which at the time was pitched to me as a Design show - not a renovation-blitz-Durie-Changing Rooms show. As soon as I heard it was for Ch 9 I said no. Even though it sounded like it had a good angle I just knew they&#039;d completely dumb it down and make it like every other renovation challenge show on 9 over the past decade. If it was an Aussie version of Arena&#039;s Top Design at least it would be a new genre. But who would expect anything but tired and dated dross from Ch 9....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an Interior Designer and I, along with other colleagues, was asked to audtion for a judging role on the show which at the time was pitched to me as a Design show &#8211; not a renovation-blitz-Durie-Changing Rooms show. As soon as I heard it was for Ch 9 I said no. Even though it sounded like it had a good angle I just knew they&#8217;d completely dumb it down and make it like every other renovation challenge show on 9 over the past decade. If it was an Aussie version of Arena&#8217;s Top Design at least it would be a new genre. But who would expect anything but tired and dated dross from Ch 9&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-69053</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-69053</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the deal with this show and the 48 hour cooling off period between the Sunday show and the eviction show on Tuesday? There was no suspense or drama at the end of the Sunday show and that left no incentive to have to wait almost two whole days to see the next episode. 
Nine has tampered with the formula and are paying for it as this show&#039;s flimsy premise and lack of character can&#039;t hold it up for long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the deal with this show and the 48 hour cooling off period between the Sunday show and the eviction show on Tuesday? There was no suspense or drama at the end of the Sunday show and that left no incentive to have to wait almost two whole days to see the next episode.<br />
Nine has tampered with the formula and are paying for it as this show&#8217;s flimsy premise and lack of character can&#8217;t hold it up for long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-69022</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-69022</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;m just happy people are still watching anything with Shaun Micallef in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;m just happy people are still watching anything with Shaun Micallef in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-69013</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-69013</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t have to be Einstein to work out this show would never work. Honestly, Nine really have a nack of getting this so wrong in recent times. Either they put so much time and effort into shows that are crap and promo the living day lights out of them or they do put a good show to air without all the in your face promo but then don&#039;t give them a chance and pull them off air before you can say........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t have to be Einstein to work out this show would never work. Honestly, Nine really have a nack of getting this so wrong in recent times. Either they put so much time and effort into shows that are crap and promo the living day lights out of them or they do put a good show to air without all the in your face promo but then don&#8217;t give them a chance and pull them off air before you can say&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew B</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68999</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68999</guid>
		<description>Like I said before, who, in these economic times, want to see home reno shows when noone can afford it.

And, who, given the state of ch 9 these days, will get into any show they put on, knowing full well that they will axe it or bump it if it does not perform.

The show is not working as expected, but 800k is better than nothing, and they have put alot into it, so they should at at least leave it on for those who care rather than taking it off for other repeats. 

Maybe then, it will build up and some faith may start coming back to 9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said before, who, in these economic times, want to see home reno shows when noone can afford it.</p>
<p>And, who, given the state of ch 9 these days, will get into any show they put on, knowing full well that they will axe it or bump it if it does not perform.</p>
<p>The show is not working as expected, but 800k is better than nothing, and they have put alot into it, so they should at at least leave it on for those who care rather than taking it off for other repeats. </p>
<p>Maybe then, it will build up and some faith may start coming back to 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall G</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68960</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68960</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certainly over these shows...why are the &#039;creatives&#039; in the TV industry so lacking in any creativity!

The other thing that put me off this show was the 10 minute ad for it the other night before Footy Classified which was already late coming on. After having to sit through a tedious ad while I got more tired I promised myself that I wouldn&#039;t tune in even if I was mildly interested as Channel Nine had treated it&#039;s Footy Classified viewers with such contempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certainly over these shows&#8230;why are the &#8216;creatives&#8217; in the TV industry so lacking in any creativity!</p>
<p>The other thing that put me off this show was the 10 minute ad for it the other night before Footy Classified which was already late coming on. After having to sit through a tedious ad while I got more tired I promised myself that I wouldn&#8217;t tune in even if I was mildly interested as Channel Nine had treated it&#8217;s Footy Classified viewers with such contempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68930</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68930</guid>
		<description>Its just a really stupid and dumbo show.  There is a show called Top Design on Arena that does this so much better.  I think that people would be interested in see a genuine show about renovating on a budget but the contestants seem to have no idea about renovation or even about making and sticking to a budget.  The best example was the person who tried to get roman blinds made by someone who did not know how to make roman blinds.  You can buy these sort of blinds off the shelf at various stores.  From what I could see the renovations were really not appropriate for their clients.  Also there was more time spent promoting video calls on telstra next g than on real renovating tips.  This show is just about product placement.  GIve the contestants a real budget and let them go and select items from anywhere the like and not just the sponsors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its just a really stupid and dumbo show.  There is a show called Top Design on Arena that does this so much better.  I think that people would be interested in see a genuine show about renovating on a budget but the contestants seem to have no idea about renovation or even about making and sticking to a budget.  The best example was the person who tried to get roman blinds made by someone who did not know how to make roman blinds.  You can buy these sort of blinds off the shelf at various stores.  From what I could see the renovations were really not appropriate for their clients.  Also there was more time spent promoting video calls on telstra next g than on real renovating tips.  This show is just about product placement.  GIve the contestants a real budget and let them go and select items from anywhere the like and not just the sponsors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benno</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68923</link>
		<dc:creator>Benno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68923</guid>
		<description>LOL, doesn&#039;t it feel good to know that nine are finally paying for the mistakes of the past?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, doesn&#8217;t it feel good to know that nine are finally paying for the mistakes of the past?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boxhead</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68920</link>
		<dc:creator>boxhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68920</guid>
		<description>I think the problem with homeMADE is with the designers (and therefore the overall concept of the show).
Who cares if they get voted off or not....they&#039;ve still got a job to go to at the end of the day.
The success of The Block and (to a lesser extent) Changing Rooms was that they were built around the relationships of real people that you could relate to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem with homeMADE is with the designers (and therefore the overall concept of the show).<br />
Who cares if they get voted off or not&#8230;.they&#8217;ve still got a job to go to at the end of the day.<br />
The success of The Block and (to a lesser extent) Changing Rooms was that they were built around the relationships of real people that you could relate to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Retter</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68916</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Retter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68916</guid>
		<description>Thats what you get when you type into a computer the base insticts of what we are suposed to like into a computer, press the &quot;Turn into lifestyle show&quot; button and follow the dot point instructions down to the skin tan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats what you get when you type into a computer the base insticts of what we are suposed to like into a computer, press the &#8220;Turn into lifestyle show&#8221; button and follow the dot point instructions down to the skin tan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68911</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68911</guid>
		<description>I also think the split format wrecks it. I&#039;m a sucker for reality tv and maybe if I got my result in one, one hour show I&#039;d watch. But i watched Sunday night&#039;s premiere, discovered at the end we&#039;d find nothing out until Tuesday and off I went. I didn&#039;t watch Tuesday because by then I didn&#039;t really care. 

I also didn&#039;t go for making some people finish early for a &#039;climax&#039; when there&#039;s no particular reason for them to finish early other than to see the &#039;mentor&#039; they can keep working on it later, and they aren&#039;t actually judged then. 

If I were to watch it, I&#039;d only watch Tuesday. With all the recaps and carry on Sunday&#039;s show becomes irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think the split format wrecks it. I&#8217;m a sucker for reality tv and maybe if I got my result in one, one hour show I&#8217;d watch. But i watched Sunday night&#8217;s premiere, discovered at the end we&#8217;d find nothing out until Tuesday and off I went. I didn&#8217;t watch Tuesday because by then I didn&#8217;t really care. </p>
<p>I also didn&#8217;t go for making some people finish early for a &#8216;climax&#8217; when there&#8217;s no particular reason for them to finish early other than to see the &#8216;mentor&#8217; they can keep working on it later, and they aren&#8217;t actually judged then. </p>
<p>If I were to watch it, I&#8217;d only watch Tuesday. With all the recaps and carry on Sunday&#8217;s show becomes irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tepee</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68909</link>
		<dc:creator>Tepee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68909</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s that bad actually.  I enjoyed The Block more but for what it is it&#039;s not bad.  But the host needs to go.  Did Nine hear him talk before hiring him?  His voice is terrible!  And obviously these sort of ratings are very problematic for Nine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that bad actually.  I enjoyed The Block more but for what it is it&#8217;s not bad.  But the host needs to go.  Did Nine hear him talk before hiring him?  His voice is terrible!  And obviously these sort of ratings are very problematic for Nine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68904</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68904</guid>
		<description>There are a few reasons for this failure. One is that this kind of show is old now. The Block, Changing Rooms, these shows were popular 5-10 years ago. 

Secondly, Nine effectively killed it off with all those ridiculous &#039;Sneak Peeks&#039;. 

Third, it&#039;s up against much better alternatives.

All in all, I&#039;m glad to see Nine getting wallopped.

It will surely be replaced with either 20 to 1 or Two and a Half men?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few reasons for this failure. One is that this kind of show is old now. The Block, Changing Rooms, these shows were popular 5-10 years ago. </p>
<p>Secondly, Nine effectively killed it off with all those ridiculous &#8216;Sneak Peeks&#8217;. </p>
<p>Third, it&#8217;s up against much better alternatives.</p>
<p>All in all, I&#8217;m glad to see Nine getting wallopped.</p>
<p>It will surely be replaced with either 20 to 1 or Two and a Half men?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68900</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68900</guid>
		<description>lol..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68894</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68894</guid>
		<description>promos: &quot;never before has there been a show like this!&quot;

maybe there&#039;s a good reason for that. lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>promos: &#8220;never before has there been a show like this!&#8221;</p>
<p>maybe there&#8217;s a good reason for that. lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac</title>
		<link>http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2009/05/homemade-in-trouble.html/comment-page-1#comment-68891</link>
		<dc:creator>mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvtonight.com.au/?p=30575#comment-68891</guid>
		<description>nine have shown so many promos that people where sick of it even before the series began, all ads do is get people to watch the first episode, it&#039;s  quality  that gets people to keep watching. and what was with millionaire having the contestants from homemade yesterday it was such a pathetic cross promotion i couldn&#039;t even watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nine have shown so many promos that people where sick of it even before the series began, all ads do is get people to watch the first episode, it&#8217;s  quality  that gets people to keep watching. and what was with millionaire having the contestants from homemade yesterday it was such a pathetic cross promotion i couldn&#8217;t even watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/19 queries in 0.613 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 504/505 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.tvtonight.com.au @ 2012-02-12 22:11:04 -->
