Comments on: Underbelly ads too hot for ‘G’ timeslot

By: David Knox

David Knox — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:30:10 +0000

Probably the way they will get around it (and the reason I didn’t use it in a headline). Still think it’s worth raising….

By: Someone BBBA

Someone BBBA — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:24:17 +0000

I wouldn’t exactly call this an Underbelly breach. It was a promotion that breached the code, not Underbelly, so I very much doubt this would fall within the bounds of the the enforceable undertaking.

By: nick

nick — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:58:49 +0000

who gives a s***. I can’t believe they’re talking about Ads, not even the show itself but ads that aired almost a year ago. Move on please

By: ryaneco

ryaneco — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:33:33 +0000

An AMCA breach means what exactly? Public exposure that Nine did the wrong thing? No Fines; No penalty?! Its a pointless organisation but at least it gives the christian groups someone to complain to.