0/5

Four Corners: Nov 11

Four Corners screens a new look at the JFK Zapruder film which will contradict the conclusions of the recent SBS doco.

jfkMonday’s Four Corners turns its attention to the JFK anniversary, with a new look at the Zapruder film by National Geographic, which will contradict the conclusions of the recent SBS doco, produced by Cordell Jigsaw Zapruder.

It’s been called the most important piece of film evidence of all time.

Locked away in the vaults of the United States National Archives, the original 8mm film shot by Abraham Zapruder, captured images that showed President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

For decades experts have analysed and re-analysed the film for clues about what happened that day in Dallas. In particular, they have focused on what the film says about the timing of the three shots fired at the President. The timeline is crucial. Experts have reasoned that even an expert marksman would find it impossible to fire three shots in the time the film shows the President first being hit and the motorcade speeding off.

However a new analysis of the film shows it could be misleading – as the film is not continuous. Close analysis proves that Zapruder began filming, stopped and then continued filming again, as the motorcade carrying the President came into Dealey Plaza and moved down Elm Street.

Using eyewitness testimony, as well as newly restored and in some cases never-before-seen images of the shooting, JFK: The Lost Bullet takes the Zapruder film as the centrepiece of a re-investigation of the crime. The documentary, made by National Geographic, digitally enhances Zapruder’s film, in combination with several other home movies shot at the time, to throw new light on the assassination.

The new analysis shows that three bullets were fired, but the first bullet (that missed its target) was shot earlier than previously thought. If that is true, it’s possible that Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at the motorcade passing below him. It shows the time available was at least eleven seconds, not six seconds as some have said. The first shot was fired while Zapruder was not filming. The second, as the film rolled again, hit both the President and Governor Connally – while the third hit John Kennedy in the head.

Using carefully designed recreations we see it is entirely plausible the first shot, heard around the Plaza by witnesses, hit a traffic light and then the concrete pavement by the side of the road.

This film explains the importance of this so-called “lost bullet”. In that way it makes a vital contribution to understanding what happened that day and points to the possibility that one man, acting alone, could indeed have changed history.

Monday 11 November at 8.30pm on ABC1.

10 Responses

  1. Toynbee. If you saw the SBS doco, you would have seen this exact test. They shot a melon using the bullet type from the shit that passed thru JFK on the lower neck and it passed thru the melon without shattering it. Then they did the same test with a bullet designed to explode on impact and it tore the melon apart. People want to hang on to some fantasy conspiracy, when it appears it was an accident that took JFKs life. Not as sexy I am afraid.

  2. tigertv, the difference isn’t in the bullets … it’s in the material the bullet is striking. A bullet passing through a neck (flesh) isn’t going to react the same as a bullet striking an enclosed skull. If you think of a bullet hitting a melon, and how that explodes on impact, you get the idea.

  3. So what about the fact that the fatal shot was from a bullet that explodes on impact and the first bullet that hit JFK went straight through him?? I think the doco on SBS got it totally right. Even if Oswald had the time to take 3 shots- cannot explain the different bullets….

  4. I Thought Doco on SBS sounded very good explanation of the death of Kennedy. Something I never thought of, I had read the Warren’s report, things did not add up to me. Its better than some strange theories. I think its time lay the ghosts rest and this great American lay in peace.

  5. There’s nothing new in this, although it’s good to see it make another round as it is the best explanation of what happened and far more sensible than those nutty conspiracy theories.

Leave a Reply