0/5

Senate rejects increasing primetime ads on SBS

SBS warns of programming & job cuts after the Senate says no to increasing primetime ads.

sbs ebeid

Legislation to increase primetime advertising on SBS has been rejected by the Senate, quashing the broadcaster’s plans to address a $53m funding shortfall under the Abbott government.

It was defeated in a 31-28 vote with Labor, Greens and key independents opposing the Bill.

SBS had been seeking to increase advertising in primetime from 5 minutes to 10 minutes after Budget cuts by the government.

It had warned of programming cuts and jobs to go if it could not address the funding shortfall.

But the proposal raised the ire of commercial networks who lobbied against it, for fear it would slice into their own revenue, while political opponents held the Abbott govt to account over its pre-election promise of no cuts to public broadcasters.

SBS Managing Director Michael Ebeid said 73% of SBS audiences would have preferred slightly more advertising than seeing programs and services cut.

“The failed passage of this legislation is a setback and leaves SBS with a $28.5 million hole in its budget over the next four years. Given this legislation did not pass and SBS has largely exhausted back-office efficiencies, this funding cut is unable to be absorbed without impacting programs and services,” he said.

“SBS will now need to consider its contingency plans internally, provide an impact report to the Federal Government and review our overall funding. Once this process is complete, SBS will be in a position to outline further details about the impact the failed legislation will have on the organisation.”

Free TV Chairman, Harold Mitchell said, “The failure of the SBS advertising bill in the Senate is great news for viewers and for the continued production of quality Australian content.

“It is a win for good public policy. It never made sense to turn SBS into a 4th commercial television licence, especially at a time when the television advertising pie is flat and we are facing increasing competition from global players who are unregulated and pay little or no tax in Australia.”

Steve Aujard president of lobby group Save Our SBS said, “In a national campaign public broadcasting advocates Margaret Pomeranz & Quentin Dempster gathered 62,000 signatures on a petition calling on the Federal Parliament to reject the Bill which would have doubled prime time advertising on SBS television and formalised product placement within programs. The Bill was introduced by Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull ostensibly to help SBS claw back revenue lost through the Abbott Government’s dishonouring of its election commitment not to cut SBS funding.”

Margaret Pomeranz said: “I’m very happy that the visionary concept of SBS has not been further diluted with more advertising. The onus now is on the Government to reinstate SBS’ depleted funding to enable it to deliver on its Charter by producing programs that explore and celebrate our multicultural society in entertaining and significant ways, leading to greater social cohesion, a role that has been pivotal to the organisation.”

This post updates.

16 Responses

  1. It’s not tony abbot doing cuts, it’s sbs choice they could pay people less or they could cut jobs. Increase of ads is just dumb. Sbs should merge with abc and just keep a foreign news channel

  2. I would leave the ads as they are on SBS. Any increase should be on SBS2 so they are more in line with the commercial networks, so Brooklyn Nine-Nine would run for 30mins and Orphan Black 60mins. SBS2 is also aimed at the younger market and would be the better fit.

  3. Twice as many ads is not “slightly more advertising”. They should aim a bit lower to start with at least – increase to 6 minutes, then perhaps then increasinging over time by a minute a year.

  4. Something they could do to save money straight away – have SBS catch up on iView. And just call it “iView” without abc branding.

      1. iview is already buckling under the weight of its high use and limited funding, I can’t see this happening under current climate. Both ABC and SBS have been discussing backroom cost-cutting areas, so if it was an option it would have been discussed.

    1. I hope not. SBS On Demand’s picture quality is much better than iView’s and you don’t get the same promo every time you watch something.

  5. If SBS should have ads, they should be between programs not within them, especially movies-many of their shows have tiny audiences and who would want to advertise with them for any significant cost?

    1. SBS did that. Nobody watched the ads and they could generate no lead-ins because half the audience went away during the ad break between shows and never came back.

      The amount of money SBS would take away from the commercial networks is peanuts since SBS’s audience is on;y 5-6% of the market and they target different viewers to a large extent. And of course the less money SBS has to buy content the more profit the commercial networks make.

      The ALP, Greens and Pomeranz know they aren’t saving SBS, they are crippling it hoping that Abbott will be blamed and it will help the ALP get back to power, with the promise of increasing spending on public broadcasting.

        1. Because that is the role of government-it’s called the Special Broadcasting Service, not ‘Wheel of Fortune Masterchef House Advertorial…

Leave a Reply