0/5

Industry calls for more local content

SPAA, AWG, ADG, MEAA, actors and producers call on the Government to lift local content, as recommended by the Convergence Review.

Industry representatives descended upon in Canberra today to call on the Federal Government to implement key recommendations of the Convergence Review relating to Australian content regulation.

They included Screen Producers Association of Australia (SPAA), the Australian Directors Guild (ADG), the Australian Writers’ Guild (AWG) and the Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance (MEAA), actors Roy Billing, Simon Burke and Matt Day, producers Penny Chapman and Brian Rosen, writers Tim Pye, Roger Simpson and John Collee and directors Gillian Armstrong, Rowan Woods and Ray Argall.

The Convergence Review recommendations include new local content quota obligations for Pay TV and the introduction of sub-quota content obligations on multichannels.

But Free to Air Broadcasters have told the government they can’t afford to pay for any additional Australian content, asking for  further reductions in their license fees.

“The Convergence Review Panel delivered its final report in March this year and made the logical and necessary recommendation that the current Australian Content Standard be extended to the new digital multi-channel environment and the Pay TV platform. We were told that the Government supported this move but, six months later, the lack of progress has us worried,” said SPAA President Brian Rosen.

ADG President Ray Argall said: “Our concern is amplified by the knowledge that commercial FTA broadcasters have made strong representations to the Government seeking not to have any additional Australian content obligations imposed on them on economic grounds. The independent production industry totally rejects these claims.

“Nine Network CEO David Gyngell was quoted in the media recently saying that ‘there’s more people watching free-to-air and pay-TV hours this year than ever there has been before. …. The industry as a whole is probably making more money than it’s ever made before.’ The Networks can’t have it both ways. They need to acknowledge their obligations to the Australian community and accept that local content regulation on digital multi-channels and Pay-TV is vital if audiences are to see acceptable levels of Australian programming on these platforms.”

AWG Vice President Roger Simpson said: “Local content regulation for Free-to-Air commercial broadcasters has long been an accepted and necessary part of the broadcasting regulation landscape. Without local content regulation there would be little or no Australian drama, children’s drama or documentary on Australian television. The simple reality is that these programs cost significantly more to make than it costs for networks to buy-in programs from the US or elsewhere.

“Australian audiences love Australian drama and documentary but audience demand isn’t enough when facing off against cheap imports. Our argument is simple – if the community and the Government have recognised for years that we need local content regulation on Free-to-Air television then it is logical that the same argument applies for the new digital and Pay-TV platforms.”

MEAA President Simon Burke said: “Our message is clear. We can’t open our doors to a flood of foreign screen content at the expense of Australian content. If the local content regulation regime is not extended to these new platforms, the implications for all Australians are clear. Less Australian content on our screens means less distinctively Australian stories for future generations. We will lose our identity in the free for all of the new digital world.”

The key recommendations of the Convergence Review relating to local content are:
1. Free-To-Air commercial broadcasters be required to screen minimum levels of first release Australian adult drama, children’s drama and documentary on their digital multi-channels equal to 50% of the current minimum obligation on their main channels; and,

2. That children’s and documentary Pay TV channels be required to spend an amount equivalent to 10% of their acquisition budgets on first release Australian programs in these genres.

7 Responses

  1. What actually defines local Content these days?With a few exceptions almost all the kids shows are sourced from outside Australia as are practically the Soap/Drama’s.

  2. Highly predictable. I’d like to be in an industry where people were forced to consume my product whether they wanted to or not.

    Fortunately the long term prognosis for local content in the age of the internet is the same as for programmers putting on overseas programs when it suits them rather than the audience – nil. This crowd seemed to have missed this massive change that means it’s now what consumers want not what somebody else thinks is good for them. Whether this is a good or bad thing (and I think it’s good) is irrelevant, it’s happening and the only way to respond is to make programs people want to watch. If Australian TV can’t or won’t do this then it’s dead.

    1. Government puts protections in place for many industries, so Film & TV should be entitled to that too. And certainly our protecting our cultural voice is important. The question is whether it has enough protection or is deserving of more, and indeed whether broadcasters should be entitled to rebates without meeting some appropriate criteria.

  3. There may be more people watching more hours of television, but in the declining advertising market, earnings have been reduced whilst Programming costs have increased.
    With the digital Channels making up about one fifth the viewing numbers of the main channels, and the GAA (Guilds & Alliances) want 50% of current quotas I wonder if GAA would work for one fifth of their regular income?
    In the current market, digital quotas are not financially viable. Look at the state of Nine and Ten, and Seven’s share price isn’t exactly flush.
    p.s Simon Burke sounds like the reverends wife.
    ‘Won’t someone think of the children’
    i wonder if he paid royalties to the Simpsons

  4. It is really a big joke to claim that Networks are making Big profits nowadays.Look at the share prices of seven and ten. It is almost one third of the price one year ago. It is also not fair to apply so many regulations on the traditional Tv while there is no such regulations on its competitors, especially Iptv.

  5. until every household in Australia has digital hd television there is no point giving quotas to multi-channels.

    and there probably never will be a point, if the networks are going to spend millions on a tv show they are going to want it on there main channel. Maybe the quota for first run Australian content should me raised higher, with no quota on the multi-channels. If a multi-channel has first run aussie content than that should count towards the quota (neighbour on 11 for an example)

    but along with this there should be a quota put on how often you can repeat something and how much US content is allowed to be shown.

  6. I don’t think quotas on digital channels will ever work out. The networks will always just take advantage of the lower pressure to rate and make some very cheap content just to reach the quota. If the industry want to do something beneficial they should just push for more quota on the main channel where the pressure to rate is a natural quality control.

    But none of this means anything if there is no penalty for not reaching the quota. There is something wrong when ten can keep getting away with making less than 40 hours of original local content per year.

Leave a Reply